AI Law Framework
com.ailawframework/ai-law-frameworkVersion 1.1.0Decide whether AI may be used for a legal task, who drafts and who checks. Australian law.
Status
Responds570 msAnswered our handshake without sign-in.- Last checked
- Nov 14, 2026, 13:46 UTC
- Latency
- 570 ms
- Remotes responding
- 1 of 1
- Sign-in
- No sign-in
- Hosting
- Hosted outside the EU (detected)
- Registry data as of
- Nov 14, 2026, 22:14 UTC
Data from the official MCP Registry, checked by run.zero. How we check
Connect
Streamable HTTP
https://ailawframework.com/mcpResponds570 msNo sign-in
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ai-law-framework https://ailawframework.com/mcpClaude Desktop and claude.ai
Settings > Connectors > Add custom connector
Name: ai-law-framework
Remote MCP server URL: https://ailawframework.com/mcpCursor
{
"mcpServers": {
"ai-law-framework": {
"url": "https://ailawframework.com/mcp"
}
}
}VS Code
code --add-mcp '{"name":"ai-law-framework","type":"http","url":"https://ailawframework.com/mcp"}'Built your own server? run.zero hosts MCP servers on European infrastructure.
Tools
19 tools
Read-only | Idempotent | Open world | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
assess_and_decideScores the AI option on adoption, efficiency and governance (step 2), caps governance by the recorded evidence, scores the manual route, and returns the decision, its reasons and the order of preference. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
assess_tool_useReturns the catalogue adoption, efficiency and governance for one tool on one task, plus the matching court AI rules. Unlisted tools stay not_recorded. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
disclosure_dutiesReturns the stored disclosure and verification duties for a forum and a document type. United States: the recorded court and client answers for the state, DC or federal courts as stored, and the stored rules and orders whose summaries say filers must disclose or certify. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
find_rulesReturns the stored court and tribunal AI instruments that match a task and a forum, using the catalogue rule matcher. With a forum named, guidance for the jurisdiction that is not tagged to that forum is returned apart, in `profession_guidance`; read it too. Court decisions about AI use are listed apart in `related_decisions`; they are not rules. United States: a state or DC (US-TX), or US-FED with federal_court and judge, returns that forum’s stored records grouped, each with whom it binds and its page. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_frameworkReturns the AI Law Framework’s rules: the five steps, the three pillars and their anchors, the decision rule, the four levels, the seven stages and their matrix, and the rules that admit no exception. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_jurisdiction_guidanceReturns the framework’s notes for one jurisdiction, and which stored AI instruments apply to a task in a court or tribunal. Name the forum, or court "no" when no court is involved. A gap means no instrument is stored for that forum. It also returns the jurisdiction’s recorded answers on telling the court and the client, with their basis and sources, and the instruments its page lists with their dates (up to 30, instruments before notes; ai_rules_more counts the rest). A row of kind no_guidance_note records that none was found. Each instrument’s summary is on the page at md_url. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_practice_area_promptReturns the published practice-area prompt for one Australian area. Court AI rules are attached when a jurisdiction code is given. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_precedentReturns one published precedent’s details: summary, when to use it, authorities, the AI-use guidance (level, what AI may and must not do, what the lawyer checks), licence, the date it states the law as at and how the library maintains it. The text itself is available through the signed-in firm connector. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_software_profileReturns the framework’s research on one AI product and plan: its facts, the governance considerations found, and the cited sources with their review dates. Accepts a profile id or a product name. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_startedFor a new user, or when asked what this is: what the AI Law Framework decides, the first questions it asks (country, then state or territory), the five steps, the skills and starting prompts, and a fictional sample matter the user can run to see a finished work record. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
get_task_guidanceReturns one task from the practice library: how AI may be used, its level, what the lawyer must review, its checkpoints, restrictions and sources, and its jurisdiction versions. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
plan_human_workSets the level of each of the seven stages of the task (step 3) from the recorded answers, research and decision, and returns what the lawyer and the AI may and may not do at each stage. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
record_answersAdds the user’s answers to the clarifying questions to the work record. Returns the questions still open, or, once all are answered, the research the task requires. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
record_researchAdds research findings, each with its source, quote and confirmation status, to the work record. Returns the required research still missing, or the scoring anchors and the governance ceiling the evidence sets. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
refine_legal_queryRestates one Australian legal question and lists the clarifying questions still open: state or territory, dates, parties, forum, output and urgency. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
search_librarySearches the framework’s published practice areas, tasks, jurisdiction versions, jurisdictions, firm-wide obligations, software profiles, precedents and workflows. Returns titles, ids, ailawframework.com links and their markdown versions. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
search_precedentsSearches the published precedent library (letters, agreements, clauses, checklists, forms, policies and more for every practice area) by title, summary and when to use it. Returns ids, titles, kinds, practice area ids, jurisdictions and the date each states the law as at. The full text is available through the signed-in firm connector. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
start_taskOpens a work record for one legal task and returns the clarifying questions the framework needs answered (step 1, define the task), less any already answered in `answers`. The first two are the country and, in Australia, the state or territory: ask them first. Read the skill ailf://skills/ai-law-framework before the first call. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
work_recordReturns the work record as markdown (steps 4 and 5): the task, the evidence, the decision, the plan, what the AI did, and the checks, approval and release left for the lawyer. | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Details
- Registry status
- Active
- Published
- Oct 17, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 17, 2026
- Repository
- Not given
- Categories (suggested)
- AI modelsSuggested categories are assigned automatically from the registry text and may be wrong. Verified operators can correct them.
- GDPR
- Not declared