Skip to main content

AI Law Framework

com.ailawframework/ai-law-frameworkVersion 1.1.0

Decide whether AI may be used for a legal task, who drafts and who checks. Australian law.

Status

Responds570 msAnswered our handshake without sign-in.

Registry data may be out of date

We could not refresh it, so this page shows the last copy.
Last checked
Nov 14, 2026, 13:46 UTC
Latency
570 ms
Remotes responding
1 of 1
Sign-in
No sign-in
Hosting
Hosted outside the EU (detected)
Registry data as of
Nov 14, 2026, 22:14 UTC

Data from the official MCP Registry, checked by run.zero. How we check

Connect

Streamable HTTP
https://ailawframework.com/mcpResponds570 ms
No sign-in

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http ai-law-framework https://ailawframework.com/mcp

Claude Desktop and claude.ai

Settings > Connectors > Add custom connector
Name: ai-law-framework
Remote MCP server URL: https://ailawframework.com/mcp

Cursor

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-law-framework": {
      "url": "https://ailawframework.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

VS Code

code --add-mcp '{"name":"ai-law-framework","type":"http","url":"https://ailawframework.com/mcp"}'

Built your own server? run.zero hosts MCP servers on European infrastructure.

Host your own MCP server on run.zero

Tools

19 tools

Tools of AI Law Framework
Read-only
Idempotent
Open world
assess_and_decideScores the AI option on adoption, efficiency and governance (step 2), caps governance by the recorded evidence, scores the manual route, and returns the decision, its reasons and the order of preference.NoYesYesNo
assess_tool_useReturns the catalogue adoption, efficiency and governance for one tool on one task, plus the matching court AI rules. Unlisted tools stay not_recorded.NoYesYesNo
disclosure_dutiesReturns the stored disclosure and verification duties for a forum and a document type. United States: the recorded court and client answers for the state, DC or federal courts as stored, and the stored rules and orders whose summaries say filers must disclose or certify.NoYesYesNo
find_rulesReturns the stored court and tribunal AI instruments that match a task and a forum, using the catalogue rule matcher. With a forum named, guidance for the jurisdiction that is not tagged to that forum is returned apart, in `profession_guidance`; read it too. Court decisions about AI use are listed apart in `related_decisions`; they are not rules. United States: a state or DC (US-TX), or US-FED with federal_court and judge, returns that forum’s stored records grouped, each with whom it binds and its page.NoYesYesNo
get_frameworkReturns the AI Law Framework’s rules: the five steps, the three pillars and their anchors, the decision rule, the four levels, the seven stages and their matrix, and the rules that admit no exception.NoYesYesNo
get_jurisdiction_guidanceReturns the framework’s notes for one jurisdiction, and which stored AI instruments apply to a task in a court or tribunal. Name the forum, or court "no" when no court is involved. A gap means no instrument is stored for that forum. It also returns the jurisdiction’s recorded answers on telling the court and the client, with their basis and sources, and the instruments its page lists with their dates (up to 30, instruments before notes; ai_rules_more counts the rest). A row of kind no_guidance_note records that none was found. Each instrument’s summary is on the page at md_url.NoYesYesNo
get_practice_area_promptReturns the published practice-area prompt for one Australian area. Court AI rules are attached when a jurisdiction code is given.NoYesYesNo
get_precedentReturns one published precedent’s details: summary, when to use it, authorities, the AI-use guidance (level, what AI may and must not do, what the lawyer checks), licence, the date it states the law as at and how the library maintains it. The text itself is available through the signed-in firm connector.NoYesYesNo
get_software_profileReturns the framework’s research on one AI product and plan: its facts, the governance considerations found, and the cited sources with their review dates. Accepts a profile id or a product name.NoYesYesNo
get_startedFor a new user, or when asked what this is: what the AI Law Framework decides, the first questions it asks (country, then state or territory), the five steps, the skills and starting prompts, and a fictional sample matter the user can run to see a finished work record.NoYesYesNo
get_task_guidanceReturns one task from the practice library: how AI may be used, its level, what the lawyer must review, its checkpoints, restrictions and sources, and its jurisdiction versions.NoYesYesNo
plan_human_workSets the level of each of the seven stages of the task (step 3) from the recorded answers, research and decision, and returns what the lawyer and the AI may and may not do at each stage.NoYesYesNo
record_answersAdds the user’s answers to the clarifying questions to the work record. Returns the questions still open, or, once all are answered, the research the task requires.NoYesYesNo
record_researchAdds research findings, each with its source, quote and confirmation status, to the work record. Returns the required research still missing, or the scoring anchors and the governance ceiling the evidence sets.NoYesYesNo
refine_legal_queryRestates one Australian legal question and lists the clarifying questions still open: state or territory, dates, parties, forum, output and urgency.NoYesYesNo
search_librarySearches the framework’s published practice areas, tasks, jurisdiction versions, jurisdictions, firm-wide obligations, software profiles, precedents and workflows. Returns titles, ids, ailawframework.com links and their markdown versions.NoYesYesNo
search_precedentsSearches the published precedent library (letters, agreements, clauses, checklists, forms, policies and more for every practice area) by title, summary and when to use it. Returns ids, titles, kinds, practice area ids, jurisdictions and the date each states the law as at. The full text is available through the signed-in firm connector.NoYesYesNo
start_taskOpens a work record for one legal task and returns the clarifying questions the framework needs answered (step 1, define the task), less any already answered in `answers`. The first two are the country and, in Australia, the state or territory: ask them first. Read the skill ailf://skills/ai-law-framework before the first call.NoYesYesNo
work_recordReturns the work record as markdown (steps 4 and 5): the task, the evidence, the decision, the plan, what the AI did, and the checks, approval and release left for the lawyer.NoYesYesNo

Details

Registry status
Active
Published
Oct 17, 2026
Updated
Oct 17, 2026
Repository
Not given
Categories (suggested)
AI modelsSuggested categories are assigned automatically from the registry text and may be wrong. Verified operators can correct them.
GDPR
Not declared

Are you the operator? Claim this listing